Having recovered their composure after a tumultuous start to 2016, investors are now looking for a new catalyst, but what will it be and where next for markets?
Sign In Close
Q: What were your key areas of interest before you joined Schroders?
A: At London Business School I worked on what was then the macro model of the UK economy. I was part of a 12-strong team working on the model and also got involved in one or two papers that we wrote including one on UK exports. It was a great introduction to macroeconomics and econometric modelling.
Q: Do you think that the models you were working on then would have been able to spot the warning signs of an impending financial crisis such as we have experienced?
A: Clearly, with recent events in mind, there were areas that the models didn’t pick up. You have to look into the way economists treat the banking system as very often in these models it is treated as very passive. It was assumed that all you had to do was work out the demand for credit from households and businesses and the banking sector would provide it. Now that we’ve had the financial crisis that is something that can’t be taken as a given because the banks are not providing credit in the way they used to. Yet even before the crisis there was an issue that the banking sector was taking on a lot more risk than we had been aware of. It was therefore driving a lot of economic activity rather than simply acting as a passive source of credit. That was also something that the models simply didn’t detect. That’s the sort of area that economists are trying to focus on at the moment. Of course rather than having the problem of banks driving things forward, they are now pushing things backward as they try to deleverage and repair their balance sheets.
Q: Have the policy responses to the crisis been insufficient due to a misunderstanding of the impact of a deleveraging banking system?
A: People have got a much better grasp on the deleveraging and what it’s doing, albeit five years into the crisis. One of the problems with the models was that we hadn’t had a financial crisis on this scale in living memory. There are a lot of economists who are now drawing on the work of Reinhart and Rogoff as a sort of template to look back at previous financial crises. Just looking at the way economies behaved after previous financial crises has actually provided some good insights into what we are currently going through. The main question for policymakers is how best to navigate this period of deleveraging to get us back to a thriving banking system. The difficulty is that the banks themselves are having to do this very slowly and the politics surrounding it is very complicated. I do have some sympathy with what Mervyn King was saying at a recent Treasury Select Committee hearing about breaking up RBS to try and get the lending system working again more efficiently.
Q: Does a banking system trying to pay down debt complicate the ability of monetary policy to impact the real economy?
A: Absolutely. I would actually take that one step further and say that in such an environment you have to use fiscal policy much more actively because clearly monetary policy is struggling to gain traction. What’s happening now is that the main tool available to monetary policy appears to be the exchange rate. So by saying you’re going to print more money than anybody else you can drive down the exchange rate but that, of course, is a zero sum game on a global level. The transmission mechanism from monetary policy looks to be weaker now but it is also coming through different channels such as asset prices. The process of boosting wealth in the economy through stronger asset prices, hopefully leading to higher consumption, and increasing the incentives to invest by driving down the cost of credit takes a long time. Before the crisis much of the work being produced suggested that you use monetary policy to steer the economy and fiscal policy should only be concerned with the medium term. However, I think that is this environment there is a case for trying to stimulate growth fiscally because the worrying thing is that if you have a long period of very weak growth you get a hysteresis effects whereby persistent high unemployment can lead to people becoming deskilled. So there is a case to be made for targeted, temporary measures to increase spending on particular projects that afford younger people the opportunity to get work experience. It will come to an end after a few years but if you’ve provided that stimulus then maybe the economy will have gained some momentum and the deleveraging process will be further along.
Q: Is there a concern that politicians are starting to rely too heavily on central bankers?
A: That is a concern but the bigger worry of the markets is the risk of inflation in the longer run. As a result of this we have already seen an increase in inflation expectations by the market and the Bank of England is already moving quite a lot in this direction. QE is helping to keep yields on government debt down so there’s not been a signal from the gilt market apart from this increase in the breakeven rate. Yet it’s beginning to ring an alarm bell
Q: In Europe the European Central Bank has been criticised for not providing sufficiently supportive monetary policy. Do you think that criticism is fair?
A: First of all, [Mario] Draghi has said that he will do “whatever is necessary” to protect the euro so it was at least a statement of intent. The bigger problem, which we have alluded to in a number of recent research pieces, is that this helped to drive down yields meaning that struggling countries breathed a sigh of relief. We then see an election in Italy that has threatened the reintroduction of the old guard who are quite frankly anti-reform. So Draghi’s done a great job of driving down yields and thereby putting finances onto a more sustainable path without having to spend any money but the cost of that may have been a certain amount of complacency in Europe. The risk now is that countries start backtracking on structural reforms and austerity. The Outright Monetary Transactions programme is only available to nations that are implementing these reforms so if they start to backtrack on them what will the ECB do?
Former Chancellor of the Exchequer Lord Lawson locked horns with columnist Hugo Dixon over the arguments for and against one of the biggest issues facing Europe this year: "Brexit".
The latest employment figures will allay concerns that the US economy is stalling.
The US labour market continues to show signs of strength.
Despite Friday's strong jobs data, we see little need for the Federal Reserve to aggressively tighten monetary policy.
The longer term prognosis for Germany looks poor.
No change in interest rates and a flatter profile for future rate rises signal a step in a more dovish direction by the Federal Reserve.
In the first of a series of four articles, Keith Wade and Marcus Jennings examine the effect of climate change on global growth and inflation.
Despite a negative headline inflation print, there are signs that inflationary pressures are picking up.
Although the well-trailed announcement by the European Central Bank (ECB) of a QE programme has been greeted with enthusiasm we would caution that investors should be careful what they wish for.
Japan emerged from recession in the fourth quarter of 2014. Despite this, we could still see further policy easing from the Bank of Japan.
Keith Wade, chief economist at Schroders, talks to Pieria about shifting market sentiment and the low rate debate
Keith Wade and Azad Zangana discuss their expectations for global economies in 2014 and where they are currently seeing global economic risks.
Has Bernanke's discussion of tapering QE revealed more about Fed thinking than he intended?
Keith Wade, chief economist at Schroders, talks to Pieria about whether talk of QE tapering is damaging the prospects for infrastructure investing.
The Schroders Economics Team have upgraded their forecast for US growth on signs that capital spending is picking up and the banking sector is returning to health.
Keith Wade, chief economist at Schroders discusses the banking system, the value of economic history and the case for fiscal stimulus.
It's possible that a society of educated people is likely to be more cultured and scientific-minded than one of non-graduates, and this should have positive externalities in the form of better political discourse and higher culture. There is, however, little evidence of this in practice.
Economics writer21 articles | View profile
RT @mybuchshelf: Are book collectors real readers, or just cultural snobs? – https://t.co/xgXw1xTl4s via @aeonmag
A collection of some of the best econ books of the year, feat - @ryanavent, @BrankoMilan, @g2parker and more...… https://t.co/x3hBAGCq00
RT @mark4harrison: Blogged: Donald Trump and America's Incomplete Contract with Itself https://t.co/I5i2PrOR8C @warwicknewsroom @cage_warwi…
RT @NIESRorg: The weak pound in your pocket: @angusarmstrong8 continues to make waves with his blog post, this time in the @FT https://t.c…
RT @LSEReviewBooks: Review Archive: The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment & the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism by Arun Sundararajan ht…